Issue templates are supposed to create Jira issues faster, not heavier. When you look at Issue Templates by Deviniti and Issue Templates Agent by Appsvio, both promise similar outcomes, but the path to get there is very different. Below is a structured comparison based on marketplace data, licensing details, and hands-on experience with both apps.
The App’s Foundation and Usability
On the Atlassian Marketplace, numbers tell an important story. Before making an investment, it is critical to use this data as the starting point for evaluation, establishing a clear benchmark for quality and user satisfaction.
| Deviniti |
|
Appsvio |
| Issue Templates |
|
Issue Templates Agent |
|
The Cloud version holds an average rating of 2.9/4. Reviews are mixed: there are some positive voices, but also a noticeable number of one-star ratings. The app has been around for a long time and supports Data Center as well as Cloud. That history is valuable, but it also often means technical debt and UX patterns that feel legacy on modern Jira Cloud.
After installation, there is no clear “Get Started” page or onboarding flow. New admins are left to figure out the configuration on their own. For less experienced Jira administrators, it is easy to get stuck before even creating the first working template. |
|
Appsvio’s app has a higher marketplace rating of 3.8/4 and generally very positive feedback. It was built as a Cloud-first solution in 2022 as part of Atlassian Codegeist, so the UI feels fresh, consistent with modern Jira, and focused on service teams rather than generic configuration.
Right after installation, you see a clear “Get Started” link and a dedicated onboarding page. This shortens time-to-value: admins can understand the core flows, set up templates, and let agents start using them in minutes, not days. |
Winner – The App’s Foundation & Usability: Appsvio
Higher rating, faster onboarding, and a modern Cloud-first UX make Appsvio the stronger, lower-risk choice. Deviniti still works, but it demands more patience and Jira expertise than most busy service teams can afford.
Security and Privacy
Legal compliance and security posture are non-negotiable requirements in cloud management. The fundamental differences in technical foundation and contract terms between these two apps create distinct levels of risk. These must be evaluated, as they directly affect your procurement process and security audits.
| Deviniti |
|
Appsvio |
| Issue Templates |
|
Issue Templates Agent |
|
Deviniti uses a custom EULA. That means your legal and procurement teams have to review and negotiate their own terms instead of relying on Atlassian’s well-understood standard agreements. This can slow down procurement and complicate internal approvals.
According to their privacy policy, end-user data may be stored indefinitely even after the app is uninstalled, which can be a concern for teams with strict retention rules. There is no dedicated Data Processing Agreement (DPA) offered to customers, which makes compliance conversations harder.
Technically, the app is a Connect app partially migrated to Forge (around 42% at the time of this analysis). That hybrid approach increases complexity: you are effectively running two architectures under one product. Data residency is limited to Europe and the US, which might not be enough for global organizations.
|
|
Appsvio uses Atlassian’s Standard Agreement and Apps Agreement. For most customers, this is a major advantage: legal teams already know these documents, procurement is simpler, and risk is easier to evaluate.
Appsvio provides a Data Processing Agreement (DPA) for customers, giving legal and security teams a clear, contractually backed framework for handling personal data.
From a technical standpoint, the app is 100% Forge, which means it inherits Atlassian’s security model and infrastructure. Data residency is handled directly by Atlassian in up to 12 regions, giving global companies more flexibility and control.
On top of Cloud Fortified, the app also carries the “Runs on Atlassian” badge, reinforcing that it operates fully in Atlassian’s secure environment. Crucially, Appsvio is also available on Atlassian Government Cloud, providing a ready-to-use option for regulated customers.
|
Winner – Security and Privacy: Appsvio
Appsvio reduces friction in procurement, offers a DPA, runs entirely on Forge, and benefits from Atlassian’s wider data residency footprint. Deviniti’s custom EULA, lack of DPA, partial migration, and data retention approach put more risk and operational overhead on your side.
Main Features
At the end of the day, the question is simple: how quickly and smoothly can your team start using templates to create issues?
| Deviniti |
|
Appsvio |
| Issue Templates |
|
Issue Templates Agent |
|
Before you can do anything meaningful, the app insists on a multi-step configuration process. You need to set up template repositories, tweak various settings, and hunt through configuration screens to get to a working scenario. Even for experienced Jira admins, this feels unnecessarily complex for a feature that should be straightforward.
The UI buries key options under several layers and expects a deep understanding of the app’s internal logic. If you are not a “power admin”, it is easy to misconfigure, get lost, or simply give up.
For something as basic as using a template during issue creation, you face a series of steps and toggles that make the experience feel heavy. Instead of supporting agents, the app demands constant attention from administrators.
|
|
With Appsvio, templates can be created immediately after installation. The app does not force an extensive configuration journey before you see value. You can define templates and start using them with minimal friction.
The app's user flows are designed for any Jira user - from Software and DevOps to Sales, HR, and Marketing - featuring fast access, clear actions, and an interface that integrates naturally into existing Jira project workflows. The result is an app that works exactly like a Jira native feature.
This means faster rollout, less training, and fewer support tickets about “how to use the app”. For teams that cannot afford weeks of experimentation, that difference is significant.
|
Winner – Main Features: Appsvio
Both apps can technically deliver issue templates. The difference is the journey. Deviniti makes you work hard for basic values. Appsvio focuses on simplicity and efficiency, giving teams a faster and more reliable path to using templates in real life.
Additional Features
Both apps aim to support broader use cases for Jira. However, how they approach “more features” matters.
| Deviniti |
|
Appsvio |
| Issue Templates |
|
Issue Templates Agent |
|
Deviniti’s long history and support for multiple deployment models suggest a broad and sometimes complex feature footprint. That can be an advantage if you need to support very specific, legacy scenarios. But it also means additional configuration, more settings to understand, and a higher cognitive load on administrators.
For many teams, this “feature weight” can feel like overhead rather than value. Every new capability is another switch that can be misconfigured, another area that requires documentation and internal training.
|
|
Appsvio’s approach is more focused and opinionated. The app concentrates on what service teams actually use day-to-day: creating, reusing, and managing templates in a way that keeps workflows clean. Instead of adding layers of complexity, Appsvio aims to stay lightweight and aligned with Jira’s native experience.
In practice, this means fewer surprises and more predictable behavior. When combined with Forge-native architecture, additional capabilities are delivered in a way that feels integrated rather than bolted on.
|
Winner – Additional Features: Appsvio
If you value simplicity, maintainability, and a low learning curve, Appsvio’s focused design is more beneficial. Deviniti might offer a broader surface area, but it comes with complexity that most teams do not really need.
Pricing
Cost is always part of the decision, especially when scaling across multiple service projects and teams. Let’s compare the app pricing for typical Cloud user tiers, in Standard Edition:
| |
Deviniti |
Appsvio |
| |
Issue Templates |
Issue Templates Agent |
| 100 users |
$1250 |
$1000 |
| 500 users |
$2690 |
$2125 |
| 1000 users |
$4290 |
$3375 |
Pricing as for 17th November 2025
At every tier, Deviniti is significantly more expensive than Appsvio for the same user count. When you combine that with a lower marketplace rating and a heavier configuration model, the value equation is hard to justify. You are effectively paying more for a more complicated implementation.
Winner – Pricing: Appsvio
Appsvio delivers a lower price point on the same user tiers while offering a better rating, simpler onboarding, and a more modern architecture. From a pure cost-to-value perspective, Deviniti simply does not keep up.
Final Result
When you look across all key dimensions - general quality, security and privacy, main feature experience, additional features, and pricing - a clear pattern emerges:
- Deviniti’s Issue Templates feels older, heavier, and more expensive. Its custom EULA, lack of DPA, hybrid Connect/Forge architecture, and complex configuration create friction in both procurement and day-to-day operations.
- Appsvio’s Issue Templates Agent is Cloud-first, Forge-native, easier to roll out, and more budget-friendly. It works with Atlassian’s standard legal framework, offers a DPA, and focuses on giving agents and admins a clean, understandable experience.

For modern Jira teams that care about speed, security, and total cost of ownership, the decision is straightforward:
The Final Result is: Appsvio is the clear winner over Deviniti for Issue Templates on Jira Cloud.
